Tumblelog by Soup.io
Newer posts are loading.
You are at the newest post.
Click here to check if anything new just came in.

April 30 2018

kaleidoskopi


Metamorphosis Of a Caterpillar

April 21 2018

kaleidoskopi
0072 4f13 500
Reposted fromelles elles viaBrainy Brainy

April 20 2018

kaleidoskopi
3858 fae6 500
Reposted fromjuli juli viaRekrut-K Rekrut-K

April 14 2018

0578 d105 500
Reposted fromtron tron viairefu irefu

April 07 2018

kaleidoskopi
7020 95bf 500
Reposted fromsnuggle snuggle

April 01 2018

kaleidoskopi
7211 c7a2
Reposted fromenn0 enn0 viaCarridwen Carridwen

March 27 2018

kaleidoskopi

March 18 2018

kaleidoskopi
Reposted fromDennkost Dennkost viathepunnery thepunnery

March 17 2018

kaleidoskopi
1426 4e6d 500
Reposted fromluron luron viaGunToRun GunToRun

March 11 2018

kaleidoskopi
kaleidoskopi
Reposted fromFlau Flau viaKudlatyBlues KudlatyBlues

I’d like you to remember the last time you found it difficult to give an explicit “no” to somebody in a non-sexual context. Maybe they asked you to do them a favour, or to join them for a drink. Did you speak up and say, outright, “No?” Did you apologise for your “no?” Did you qualify it and say, “Oh, I’m sorry, I can’t make it today?” If you gave an outright “no,” what privileged positions do you occupy in society, and how does your answer differ from the answers of people occupying more marginalised positions?

This form of refusal was analysed in 1999 by Kitzinger and Frith (K&F) in Just Say No? The Use of Conversation Analysis in Developing a Feminist Perspective on Sexual Refusal. Despite the seeming ambiguity in question/refusal acts like, “We were wondering if you wanted to come over Saturday for dinner,” “Well, uhh, it’d be great but we promised Carol already,” they are widely understood by the participants as straightforward refusals.

K&F conclude by saying that, “For men to claim [in a sexual context] that they do not ‘understand’ such refusals to be refusals (because, for example, they do not include the word ‘no’) is to lay claim to an astounding and implausible ignorance of normative conversational patterns.”

Under Duress: Agency, Power, and Consent

Like I’ve said before. There’s no excuse.

(via home-of-amazons)

Reposted fromzweisatz zweisatz viaareyoubored areyoubored
kaleidoskopi
kaleidoskopi

March 09 2018

kaleidoskopi
8531 24c2 500

March 04 2018

kaleidoskopi
Bischofswerda, 18.02.2018

March 01 2018

kaleidoskopi

February 27 2018

kaleidoskopi
8181 2fb0 500
Reposted frompunisher punisher viakuroinekochris kuroinekochris
kaleidoskopi
kaleidoskopi
5519 5b2d
Reposted fromsosna sosna viawearebornfree wearebornfree
Older posts are this way If this message doesn't go away, click anywhere on the page to continue loading posts.
Could not load more posts
Maybe Soup is currently being updated? I'll try again automatically in a few seconds...
Just a second, loading more posts...
You've reached the end.

Don't be the product, buy the product!

Schweinderl